Thursday, May 22, 2014

Then and Now: Beauty and the Beast

In anticipation of the blogfest being hosted next month by the Armchair Squid, Nicki Elson, Suze, and Nancy Mock, I'm here to celebrate something that was hugely important to me when I was younger, and to reflect on whether I see it differently now.  Because of the dual nature of this exercise, I'm splitting up my contribution into two posts.  In this one, I'll spill my reminiscences about something I haven't watched since it first aired a quarter century ago.  Then I plan to re-watch a lot of it over the next couple of weeks, and then (on the blogfest day of June 13) I'll let y'all know whether I'm looking through rose-colored glasses or not.

Our kind hosts are thinking mainly about movies.  However, as I scanned through my DVDs and old VHS tapes, one old TV show kept clamoring for attention...


The series "Beauty and the Beast" ran from 1987 to 1989 -- two stellar seasons with the main leads, followed by a half-season that many fans want to forget.  By all accounts, it was a supremely geeky show.  Any discussion I have about it must be covered in labels reading "You had to be there" from top to bottom.

The tragic romance angle was prominent -- Ron Perlman's heroic lion-man "Vincent" pined for Linda Hamilton's suave district attorney "Catherine."  She loved him, too, but she had to juggle her life in the sunlit world of New York City with Vincent's hidden "world below."  (Not in the sewers... below them. They made it look very cozy.)  It was courtly love to the extreme. Vincent alternated between reading poetry to Catherine and rushing to her rescue when she would inevitably get into trouble.  Its twist on the fairy tale was that the "Beast" never turned back into a handsome prince, so the lovers could never really be together.

As a 20-to-22 year old poetry-writing college kid, I do admit that the romance angle appealed to me.  I would have given everything I had for a love so pure and complete.  But I think my fascination with the show came more from the utopian "world below" populated by Vincent and his secretive compatriots.  The people down there had more than a whiff of magic and mysticism about them.  It was a tight-knit family of individualistic misfits, some of whom escaped the upper world into the tunnels, and others who were born there.  Catherine became one of many "Helpers" who aided them and kept the existence of their world a secret.

Above I mentioned a third half-season that fans want to forget.  Suffice to say that the tragic romance of the first two seasons became even more tragic in the resolution of the second season's final cliffhanger.  (Linda Hamilton probably had to leave to start lifting weights for Terminator 2...)  I stopped watching out of protest after it looked like they were bringing in another love interest for Vincent.  Still, for several years after I kept kind of a light on inside for that fictional universe.  It was something special.

I've got the first season on DVD, and I've identified approximately 10 episodes that I'd like to re-watch.  On June 13, I'll let you know what modern-day Cygnus thinks of it!  :-)

7 comments:

  1. 'Still, for several years after I kept kind of a light on inside for that fictional universe.'

    I really like the way you worded this. And I have to say I'm really looking forward to your post.

    As for movie vs. TV, can you believe I'm actually thinking of doing neither but something entirely different? I don't want to set a bad example as a host, but I may have to ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. I'm looking forward to watching these episodes, and to seeing what you post about.

      The cool thing about the T&N concept is that it can be applied to nearly anything. As long as we once cared a lot about it, and now view it with a more experienced eye.

      Delete
    2. Or wish, somehow, to integrate.

      Delete
  2. I think it will be interesting to see how you view the show all these years later. My guess is that you will perceive it pretty differently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think so, but I will also make a staunch attempt to avoid cynicism and snarkiness. :-)

      Delete
  3. Cool! I don't know the TV series at all. Have you ever seen Cocteau's film version from the '40s? Lots of fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think I have, but I've seen stills. I think I saw "Blood of a Poet" in a college surrealism class. Wild stuff!

      Delete