Friday, April 25, 2014

Cephalopod Coffeehouse: Zamyatin's We

Wow -- I think it's been half a year since I've been able to participate in the Armchair Squid's wonderful gathering of online book lovers.  A few weeks ago I happened upon Yevgeny Zamyatin's 1921 short novel "We."  I thought I knew the landscape of bleak 20th century dystopias pretty well... Orwell, Huxley, Rand... later Bradbury, Vonnegut, Burgess, and a host of movie-makers.  I didn't know about Zamyatin, who was the granddaddy of them all.  (Turns out that Orwell and the rest knew about him, though!)  The manuscript of "We" was smuggled out of the young Soviet Union and translated into English many years before it would ever see publication in its native language.


Readers of Nineteen Eighty-Four and Fahrenheit 451 -- and fans of Logan's Run and Brazil -- won't be surprised by the broad-brush outlines of the plot.  Mathematician D-503 (no names here) is living in the perfect collectivist world, and is happily working towards humanity's greatest achievement: a huge rocket called the Integral that will bring mankind's well-ordered lifestyle to the stars.  Archaic concepts like freedom and individuality were bred out of humanity thousands of years ago.  But what happens when he meets I-330, an alluring woman who has some frustratingly outdated ideas about life?  And why does he start seeing the word "MEPHI" scrawled in graffiti on the walls of his perfect city?

I had to pause quite a few times to marvel that "We" was written in the late 19-teens, long before so many of these sci-fi tropes were set in stone.  Zamyatin's protagonist is writing a day-by-day account of his life to be stored aboard the Integral and be read by the surely primitive beings on other worlds.  The alienness of his society is conveyed by the fact that most adjectives (and other descriptions of what D-503 sees around him) don't contain cultural references, but instead refer to Kandinskian abstractions like pure colors, geometrical shapes, and mathematical concepts.  In stark contrast to all this rationality is the ever-present diary format, which is meant to be raw and unedited.  Often there are sentences that just trail off with no resolution, allowing the imagination to....

Many cautionary future tales suffer from the weakness of being too heavy-handed -- so much so that you can't quite picture how anyone let it happen, or how anyone manages to carry on living day after day.  But Zamyatin conveys some of its appeal.  The people aren't the hypnotized drones you might expect.  Most of them live engaged, stress-free lives in a world in which they are living out their purpose.  I've got to say that I was a bit hypnotized by the ordered bliss at times!  Of course, every few pages the protagonist would contrast his perfect world with the ancient, barbaric chaos of liberty, and the reader is immediately reminded of what's coming.  Maybe I'm just a sucker for mathematically ordered music:
"Crystal chromatic degrees converging and diverging in infinite sequences and the summarizing chords of Taylor and Maclaurin formulae with a gait like Pythagorean pant-legs, so whole-toned and quadrilateral-heavy; the melancholy melodies of diminishing oscillations; pauses producing bright rhythms according to Frauenhofer lines, the spectral analysis of planets... What magnificence!  What unwavering predictability!  And how pitiful that whimsical music of the Ancients, delimited by nothing except wild fantasy..."
It kind of reminds me of Hermann Hesse's futuristic realm of Castalia in The Glass Bead Game -- i.e., inhabitants living a sparkling inner mental life, while being surrounded by social conditions that we'd find stifling and unacceptable.

Although there are some parts of the novel that drag on a bit, there are some truly original insights and ideas.  I won't spoil the ending, but I can say that, in a way, it's more intriguing than the endings of all the dystopian books and movies I mentioned above.  I'm glad I found this novel, and I highly recommend it as an alternative if you're considering dipping back into Orwell or Huxley yet again.

"We" have assumed control.

18 comments:

  1. The books written before WWII are some of the most insightful books ever. "We" is something I will investigate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for stopping by, Huntress. For a while in my 20s, I think I was reading only books from between WWI and WWII. :-)

      Delete
  2. Smuggled out of Russia and translated that says a lot about a book. We can tend to forget that there are great authors out there from the last century.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The edition of "We" that I bought (with the cover shown above) has two introductions that get into Zamyatin's biography a bit. Fascinating stuff!

      Delete
  3. I bought this book after finishing Brave New World earlier this year. It kept coming up in reviews I read of Huxley's work. I haven't got to it yet but I was very intrigued by the premise and the author himself. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I recommend it... but those trailed-off sentences can sometimes be a bit much. You sometimes want to shake the narrator or speaker and say "No more hemming and hawwing! Just spit it out already!" :-)

      Delete
  4. I always liked this book. I have wondered if reading it in the original Russian would be revelatory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't tell for sure, but the Russian for "we" (1st person plural pronoun) looks like a near match for their word for "peace." I wonder if that contributed to the choice of this word for the title.

      Delete
  5. Shawn watched a Rush documentary recently and there's a ton of video footage in which the members of the band are the age pictured above.

    It kinda bugs me that 'cautionary tales' and 'dystopia' has been around for as long as they have. Actually, it makes something inside me itch big time. I have a lot of thoughts on subverting the format but am not ready to 'talk' about them yet.

    Fantastic, thoughtful review, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. have been around

      Also, rereading my comment makes me sound like I'm taking my big thoughts a little too seriously and made me chuckle at myself. :)

      Delete
    2. Well, I'm glad that syrup of ipecac is available when we need it, but I'm not about to start including it in dinner recipes. :-)

      I'd definitely like to hear more about subverting the format. Whenever you're ready, Chlorine.

      It also goes without saying that Neil's mustache was as epic as his songs.

      Delete
    3. 'I'd definitely like to hear more about subverting the format. Whenever you're ready, Chlorine.'

      Thanks, Cyg.

      Delete
  6. Usually I'm not too interested in this kind of book, but your review has made me curious.

    PS. That photo is hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool... please c'mon back if you do read it.

      The photo is from the album sleeve of Rush's 2112, which contains a full-side epic song about a future society much like Zamyatin's. I could've doubled the length of this post by comparing and contrasting to this. :-) The poses in the photo are awesome, though. Alex, on the left, looks really into the whole concept. Geddy, on the right, looks like he's thinking "So... we're really doing this, are we?"

      Delete
  7. The book sounds great - as does the actual history of the book. Now I'm so curious...awesome review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! It was a fun read -- well, as fun as that style of book can be.

      By the way, I think you'll like my final move in my 10-circle Glass Bead Game. I hope to post it in a few days.

      Delete
  8. The publication history alone is fascinating, though I suppose not surprising given the time and place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those historical introductions were mini adventures in themselves! :-)

      Delete